Continuous Improvement Plan
2025-2026 Title I Schoolwide Diagnostic for ACIP
Component 1: Comprehensive Needs Assessment (Sec. 1114(b)(6))
4th-grade math needs:
- Geometry: 36% below grade level
- Measurement & Data: 32%
- Algebraic Thinking: 26%
- Number & Operations: 27%
- Geometry: 34% below grade level
- Measurement & Data: 29%
- Algebraic Thinking: 26%
- Number & Operations: 20%
- Informational Text: 36% below grade level
- Vocabulary: 27%
- Literature: 23%
- Phonics: 22%
- High-Frequency Words: 6%
- Phonological Awareness: 0%
- Informational Text: 41% below grade level
- Vocabulary: 35%
- Literature: 35%
- Phonics: 14%
- High-Frequency
- Chronic Absenteeism had decreased from the year prior.
3. What conclusions were drawn from the results?
4th-Grade math had a real issue with a drop in ACAP scores. Being able to target their collab time to a more tiered approach. We also dove into subgroup data to identify the lowest-performing group. EL and SPED were our lowest-performing groups, with both scoring in the C category.
4. What information was concluded as a result of analyzing perception, student achievement, school programs/processes, and demographic data?
- Student Achievement: Analysis of i-Ready and ACAP data led to the conclusion that while current digital resources stimulate curiosity, there is a need for a more "balanced system" of assessment. Specific achievement targets were set: 60% proficiency in Math and 70% in Reading by the Spring i-Ready assessment.
- School Programs/Process: A key conclusion is the need to move from informal collaboration to "intentional and consistent" weekly meetings focused specifically on student work and data.
- Demographic Data: The assessment identified a need to "balance class lists" to better sustain a culture of fairness, equity, and inclusion
Observational Data: Goal 2.1 uses classroom walkthroughs, lesson plan audits, and QR codes for each room to collect real-time instructional data. Process Data: Goal 1.4 measures the effectiveness of the school's "Collab Time" through team agendas and minutes, ensuring the process of collaboration is actually occurring.
Component 2: Schoolwide Reform Strategies (Sec. 1114 (7)(A)(i)(ii)(iii)(I)(II)(III)(IV)(V))
1. Identify the instructional strategies and methods used that strengthen the academic program in the school, increase the amount and quality of learning time, and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum, which may include programs, activities, and courses necessary to provide a well-rounded education.
Athens Intermediate School strengthens its academic program through the dual implementation of Marzano’s Instructional Framework and AVID Schoolwide strategies, ensuring both high-yield instruction and student agency. Quality learning time is maximized through Weekly Collaborative Teams that use data to pivot instruction and individualized i-Ready learning paths. AIS provides a well-rounded and enriched curriculum by utilizing Powerful Task Design, embedding 'Portrait of a Graduate' skills into daily lessons, and providing opportunities for acceleration through the use of Level 4 Proficiency Scales
2. Address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of those at risk of not meeting the challenging State academic standards, through activities which may include—
- counseling, school-based mental health programs, specialized instructional support services, mentoring services, and other strategies to improve students’ skills outside the academic subject areas
-
preparation for and awareness of opportunities for postsecondary education and the workforce, which may include career and technical education programs and broadening secondary school students’ access to coursework to earn postsecondary credit while still in high school (such as Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, dual or concurrent enrollment, or early college high schools
-
implementation of a schoolwide tiered model to prevent and address problem behavior, and early intervening services, coordinated with similar activities and services carried out under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.)
We were able to use math and reading interventionists to properly create a schedule to purposefully and adequately tier III intervention.
Also created a system for every Friday to review weekly data and target students who were on pace to be chronically absent.
Our counselor leads a daily counseling class where she presents a survey to gather students' needs. She was able to tailor her lessons based off the survey.
We developed a school-wide Eagle Code that is posted for every area of our building. The eagle code is discussed on morning announcements to reinforce student behavior. Having clearly identified expectations throughout the building.
3. Describe how the school provides opportunities for the most academically needy students to receive support and reinforcement of academic skills beyond the Regular School Day.
- Procedures: AIS uses the ALSDE Employment Survey during enrollment to identify families who have moved within the last 36 months for agricultural or fishing work.
- Procedures: Identification begins with the Home Language Survey. Students are then screened using the W-APT/WIDA Screener to determine proficiency levels.
- Strategies: * Instruction: Students receive support from an EL Teacher using the WIDA Standards and individual EL Plans.
- Assessment: Progress is monitored annually via the ACCESS for ELLs assessment.
- Procedures: While all students at AIS benefit from the Title I Schoolwide status, identification for specific support is linked to Free/Reduced Lunch eligibility and "At-Risk" flags in PowerSchool.
- Strategies:
- Technology: The 1:1 iPad (Power Up) initiative ensures students have digital access at home, regardless of family income
- Basic Needs: Coordination with the school counselor for the Full Tummy Project.
- Procedures: We follow strict IDEA guidelines. Students are identified through the SST (Student Support Team) referral process or child-find activities, followed by a comprehensive evaluation.
- Strategies:
- IEP Implementation: Instructional strategies are guided by the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP), focusing on accommodations such as extended time, small-group testing, and modified assignments.
- Specialized Tools: Use of SPIRE for reading intervention or specific math manipulatives as outlined in the provided improvement template.
- Procedures: The district Federal Programs Coordinator maintains contact with local residential facilities or foster care agencies.
- Strategies: We ensure immediate enrollment and credit coordination. The Guidance & Counseling Department provides targeted SEL (Social Emotional Learning) support to help these students stabilize emotionally and academically after transitions.
6. Homeless Students (McKinney-Vento)
- Procedures: Students are identified via the Residency Questionnaire in the enrollment packet. The District Homeless Liaison verifies eligibility under the McKinney-Vento Act.
- Strategies: Academic Continuity: Students are automatically eligible for Title I services, including supplemental tutoring and school supplies.
N/A for Elementary Schools
Component 3: Evaluation (How does the school evaluate the implementation of the schoolwide program?)
1. How does the school evaluate the results achieved by the schoolwide program using data from the State's annual assessments and other indicators of academic achievement?
-
Summative State Data: The school analyzes ACAP (Alabama Comprehensive Assessment Program) results annually to measure proficiency and growth in ELA, Math, and Science. This data is disaggregated by subgroups (EL, Special Education, Economically Disadvantaged) to identify broader institutional gaps.
-
Formative/Interim Indicators: We rely heavily on i-Ready Diagnostic data (Fall, Winter, and Spring) to measure "stretch growth." These diagnostics act as the primary "pulse check" to see if Title I interventions are working in real-time.
-
Non-Academic Indicators: WE evaluate "the whole child" by tracking Chronic Absenteeism rates (reviewed in weekly Friday meetings) and discipline referrals, as these factors directly impact academic results.
-
Growth Over Proficiency: For students furthest from the standards (Tier III), the school measures success by i-Ready Stretch Growth targets. Effectiveness is determined by whether these students are making more than one year's worth of academic growth in a single school year to close the achievement gap.
-
PST Monitoring: The Problem-Solving Team (PST) meets regularly to review the progress of students receiving intensive intervention. If a student is not responding to a specific intervention strategy, the program is deemed "ineffective" for that child, and the strategy is adjusted.
-
Subgroup Gap Analysis: We use the eProve platform to compare the performance of historically disadvantaged subgroups against the general population. A decrease in the "Achievement Gap" percentage on state assessments is the ultimate metric for program effectiveness.
- Weekly Revisions (Collab Time): Revisions happen at the classroom level every week. Meet in Collaborative Teams to analyze student work and "adjust instructional strategies" immediately based on current mastery.
- Mid-Year Review: In January, the Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) conducts a formal review of Winter i-Ready data. If the school is not on track to meet the goal of 60% Math and 70% Reading proficiency, the ACIP action steps are revised to reallocate resources (e.g., more coaching cycles or different intervention materials).
